diff CSP2/CSP2_env/env-d9b9114564458d9d-741b3de822f2aaca6c6caa4325c4afce/share/doc/xz/COPYING @ 68:5028fdace37b

planemo upload commit 2e9511a184a1ca667c7be0c6321a36dc4e3d116d
author jpayne
date Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:23:26 -0400
parents
children
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/CSP2/CSP2_env/env-d9b9114564458d9d-741b3de822f2aaca6c6caa4325c4afce/share/doc/xz/COPYING	Tue Mar 18 16:23:26 2025 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+
+XZ Utils Licensing
+==================
+
+    Different licenses apply to different files in this package. Here
+    is a summary of which licenses apply to which parts of this package:
+
+      - liblzma is under the BSD Zero Clause License (0BSD).
+
+      - The command line tools xz, xzdec, lzmadec, and lzmainfo are
+        under 0BSD except that, on systems that don't have a usable
+        getopt_long, GNU getopt_long is compiled and linked in from the
+        'lib' directory. The getopt_long code is under GNU LGPLv2.1+.
+
+      - The scripts to grep, diff, and view compressed files have been
+        adapted from GNU gzip. These scripts (xzgrep, xzdiff, xzless,
+        and xzmore) are under GNU GPLv2+. The man pages of the scripts
+        are under 0BSD; they aren't based on the man pages of GNU gzip.
+
+      - Most of the XZ Utils specific documentation that is in
+        plain text files (like README, INSTALL, PACKAGERS, NEWS,
+        and ChangeLog) are under 0BSD unless stated otherwise in
+        the file itself. The files xz-file-format.txt and
+        lzma-file-format.xt are in the public domain but may
+        be distributed under the terms of 0BSD too.
+
+      - Translated messages and man pages are under 0BSD except that
+        some old translations are in the public domain.
+
+      - Test files and test code in the 'tests' directory, and
+        debugging utilities in the 'debug' directory are under
+        the BSD Zero Clause License (0BSD).
+
+      - The GNU Autotools based build system contains files that are
+        under GNU GPLv2+, GNU GPLv3+, and a few permissive licenses.
+        These files don't affect the licensing of the binaries being
+        built.
+
+      - The 'extra' directory contains files that are under various
+        free software licenses. These aren't built or installed as
+        part of XZ Utils.
+
+    For the files under the BSD Zero Clause License (0BSD), if
+    a copyright notice is needed, the following is sufficient:
+
+        Copyright (C) The XZ Utils authors and contributors
+
+    If you copy significant amounts of 0BSD-licensed code from XZ Utils
+    into your project, acknowledging this somewhere in your software is
+    polite (especially if it is proprietary, non-free software), but
+    it is not legally required by the license terms. Here is an example
+    of a good notice to put into "about box" or into documentation:
+
+        This software includes code from XZ Utils <https://tukaani.org/xz/>.
+
+    The following license texts are included in the following files:
+      - COPYING.0BSD: BSD Zero Clause License
+      - COPYING.LGPLv2.1: GNU Lesser General Public License version 2.1
+      - COPYING.GPLv2: GNU General Public License version 2
+      - COPYING.GPLv3: GNU General Public License version 3
+
+    A note about old XZ Utils releases:
+
+        XZ Utils releases 5.4.6 and older and 5.5.1alpha have a
+        significant amount of code put into the public domain and
+        that obviously remains so. The switch from public domain to
+        0BSD for newer releases was made in Febrary 2024 because
+        public domain has (real or perceived) legal ambiguities in
+        some jurisdictions.
+
+        There is very little *practical* difference between public
+        domain and 0BSD. The main difference likely is that one
+        shouldn't claim that 0BSD-licensed code is in the public
+        domain; 0BSD-licensed code is copyrighted but available under
+        an extremely permissive license. Neither 0BSD nor public domain
+        require retaining or reproducing author, copyright holder, or
+        license notices when distributing the software. (Compare to,
+        for example, BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License which does have
+        such requirements.)
+
+    If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask for more information.
+    The contact information is in the README file.
+